Musings
Messenger
Jan 11th
In response to the issues happening on Twitter between a friend of mine, Corinna, and one of Vancouver’s premiere bloggers, Rebecca, I asked a question on Twitter. The question was this: why was Corinna blocked from the Best of 604 awards, a claim that I heard from Corinna on Sunday night. I asked on Twitter for some clarification: why was she banned?
I try not to take sides, even when it involves my friends, until I know both sides of the story clearly. Still, I don’t know Rebecca except by reputation, and I know Corinna personally, so I took her words at face value.
This morning, I got an e-mail from Rebecca, trying to clear up the situation. Without commentary on its contents, I thought I’d post it here so other people could see her side of the story.
First of all, you can read what Corinna had to say over on her blog. Then, you can read the below e-mail and see what you think.
Hi Dan,
I just wanted to clear the air about the Best of 604 Awards as I’ve seen some chatter lately on Twitter.
They have and always will be people’s choice awards. People nominate and people vote, me or judges are and never will be involved. For the 2009-2010 event I opened up a Twitter account and updated the home page http://bestof604.com.
I’m not sure why anyone would think they are “banned”, I’m not even sure in what context. I have a complete list of winners available here, listing all 1st, 2nd and 3rd place bloggers:
http://www.miss604.com/2008/12/best-of-604-winners-and-the-morning-after.htmlThe event hasn’t even been setup this year but I did announce nominations will once again be open March 1st. That’s about all the planning that has taken place so far.
If you have any concerns, please let me know as this is 100% about the blogs that people love and want to support — from mainstream news to knitting, it doesn’t matter.
Cheers,
Rebecca
So that’s what Rebecca had to say. I’m not going to pass any judgement in either direction yet. There’s still some details I feel like I’m missing before I make my final judgement, but hopefully this will help clear the air, and not fan the flames.
The iPhone 3GS: How does it make you feel?
Jun 25th
So I had a few days this week to play around with a new iPhone 3GS, courtesy of Tris Hussey and the fine folks at M2O Productions. I won’t bore you with beautiful macro photography, insipid ‘I’m making a video!’ videos, or side-by-side speed comparisons, because those have all been done to death. If you want to see those (and they’re all worth seeing), go check out Daring Fireball. Gruber’s shared (and created) a half-dozen links by now, and there’s nothing more I can add. I’d rather talk about something less concrete – specifically, how the device feels.
It’s hard to come up with an analogy that everyone can appreciate and which fits well enough that it will help, but I’ll try. Consider the first time you saw a TV show or movie in HD – perhaps you bought an HDTV, perhaps you upgraded from digital cable to HD, or you bought a Blu-Ray or HD-DVD player. Maybe you just saw one at Best Buy playing your favourite summer blockbuster. You see what’s on the screen, and it’s still the same, really. It’s the same movie you’ve enjoyed in the past, the same TV shows you’ve always loved. The plot hasn’t changed, the writing isn’t any better. It’s quantitatively clearer, but that provides a qualitative improvement.
If you’re a gamer, the comparison is easy. Do you remember the first time you upgraded your video card to the latest and greatest? The frame rate increased, you get more texture quality, it’s smoother. There’s less jitter, scrolling and panning is smoother. You didn’t really notice it before, but now it feels better. It’s more natural, it flows better.
And that’s really the key. The iPhone isn’t faster, because ‘faster’ doesn’t connote the right differences. The iPhone is more fluid. Moving from one application to another, or from one screen to the next, or scrolling around on a website or reading your e-mail, it flows better. It’s not just that the current iPhone is slow, it’s more that it breaks your stride.
Here’s another example. Let’s say you’ve got a room in your house with doors on two sides, directly opposite. On the other two sides, you have a couch and a TV, and in the middle, there’s a coffee table. Let’s also say you have to walk through this room to get from your bedroom to the kitchen, so it’s a trip you make fairly often. If you put your coffee table directly between the two doors, then every time you cross this room, you’ll have to go around it. It’s not a big deal, but it throws off your momentum. You’ll have to step to the side twice every time you go through the room. You’ll also have to go through the line of sight from the couch to the TV, so you might have to slow down if someone’s playing games or watching a movie, waiting for the perfect opportunity, and you’re more likely to bang your knee while going around it, maybe if you’re in a hurry or it’s dark.
Using the iPhone 3G now is a lot like that. There are a lot of situations now where the flow of action from one activity to the next is disrupted. The straight path from point A to point B has a detour in the middle, an obstacle, a delay, and it slows your momentum ever so slightly. Enough of these delays and it becomes subconsciously frustrating. The iPhone 3GS does away with that.
Now here’s the key, and here’s why it’s hard to quantify. You probably didn’t notice any of those delays. You go around that coffee table so often that you don’t even realize it’s there, but on a subconscious level, it bothers you. You don’t think to move the coffee table because you don’t realize it bothers you, but if you moved it a half a foot out of the way, you’d decrease your subconscious frustration ever so slightly, and you’d find yourself enjoying your home more (and you’d have fewer bruised shins to show for it).
I didn’t dislike Twitterrific on the iPhone, not really. It was ok, but not great. The UI was nice, but I just didn’t really care for it, preferring Tweetie. I couldn’t tell you why, I just didn’t like Twitterrific’s interface, or maybe it was the colours, or maybe it was just kind of convoluted to use. I don’t know why I didn’t care for it, but I didn’t.
Now, however, I know. Twitterrific wasn’t slow, you have to understand. I wasn’t sitting there, staring at loading screens or progress bars, waiting for it to accomplish the task I’d set it to. The real reason I didn’t care for Twitterrific was because there was some subtle, imperceptible lag when moving from one action to the next. I didn’t notice it consciously, but subconsciously it bothered me, it made me dislike the app for reasons I didn’t realize or understand. On the 3GS this week, I used Twitterrific exclusively. I didn’t try any other Twitter apps, and it didn’t occur to me to want to. Twitterrific was great, and I was happy to keep using it, because that unconscious frustration with minute waits and imperceptible lag was gone.
And that’s what it feels like to move from an iPhone 3G to a 3GS. It’s a more satisfying experience, a more enjoyable device, but not for reasons that you might think. It takes better pictures, but I don’t really care. It records video, but I don’t really care. It has faster data access, but I don’t really care. It has voice control, but I don’t really care.
The real difference between the iPhone 3G and 3GS isn’t something that you’re likely to notice unless you’re looking for it. You’ll enjoy the new phone for reasons that you can’t really explain, and when people ask why you paid an extra few hundred dollars for a not-so-different phone, you won’t regret it, but you won’t be able to defend your decision either, because you can’t reduce the experience to numbers.
It just feels better.
Digital Downloads and Analog Media
Apr 4th
Note: The following post is very Apple-centric, re: iTunes, AppleTV, etc. Substitute if you like any similar technology except Windows-specific ones. Oh wait, that only leaves Apple.
I’m not asking too much. I mean, I don’t watch a lot of TV. Any, in fact. I don’t even own a TV. I don’t have a DVD player or TiVo, and I don’t have cable.
If you consider my impact on the television industry, you’ll find it’s not really worth factoring into any equation. And yet, if they want to reach into my pockets and clean out any part of my paycheque that doesn’t go to food, rent, or Starbucks, it’s a pretty simple matter. In fact, I’ll tell them right now what needs doing.
A tweet from the lovely Shannon McKarney got me started down this line of thought, and brought up some old ideas I’d had. Not complicated ideas, nothing I’d consider revolutionary, but pretty straightforward ideas. Her question revolved around how, given the demand indicated by the Wolverine workprint leak and the feeding frenzy of downloading it set off, can movie companies use the internet to make money? There’s a market, how do you tap it?
Simple. Give me what I want the way I want it.
Movies: easy. Release in theatres on a Friday. Next Friday, release on iTunes in HD for rent. Depending on the movie, MAYBE wait two weeks. Two weeks after that, release on Blu-Ray and DVD. Down the road, THEN you come out with extras. BD discs with behind-the-scenes stuff, all the extra fluff, bonus sequences, director’s cuts, and so on.
I want to watch movies, but that’s not what theatres are about to me. Theatres are about pushing your way through a crowd, about getting the worst seats in the house because there are no two adjacent seats together. They’re about overpriced, substandard food, five dollar soft drinks, sticky floors, and people talking to each other behind you and kicking the back of your seat.
Imagine not having to pay for that. Imagine sitting down at home, cooking up some pasta, making a sandwich, grabbing a beer, blending a smoothie, or BBQing some steaks, and then putting a movie up on the big screen. Enjoying a movie even when your baby is sick, or your child is teething. Recovering from the flu, or staying in with your sweetheart on a rainy Sunday evening. It’s a better experience all around.
Some people will prefer the classic, and for groups of any reasonable size, the theatre will just make more sense. It won’t kill the theatres, but it will augment them. More people will watch movies because the barrier to entry will be lowered. The giant screens are irreplaceable, but that just justifies them staying in business and charging more. It’s an experience, but you don’t always want it.
So what about TV shows? Possibly a little more complicated, but I have an idea about that too. First things first: confessions. I download all the TV I watch. I don’t pay for it, I don’t have cable. No one gets anything from me. If I had the following solution, I would pay.
Imagine a scenario: It’s Monday night – Lost night. You’ve got a long day at work, but at the end of it, you drive home. Throw together a dinner or some leftovers, sit down on the couch, turn on your AppleTV, and flip on Heroes. Watch it, in all its HD glory. When your wife gets home from her late-late shift, she can watch it again. The key factor: you don’t have cable. You never had. No DVR, no anything.
You bought a subscription to Heroes. You paid, up-front, for the entire season. Every Monday morning, your AppleTV downloads the next episode of Heroes for you, automatically. When you get home, you don’t have to wait for it to download, you just jump right in. The AppleTV respects airdates by requesting a key from Apple’s servers before it’s allowed to play it. It knows what time it’s supposed to be available, and once that time comes, it will let you play it. It verifies with the servers, and the content is unlocked – for good. It costs a little extra to get it in HD, but it’s worth it.
The end result? High-quality digital versions of the show, each episode sent to your home so that you can watch it on your own terms, without having to subscribe to cable TV, get the HD pack, get the HD PVR. For me, it would be about $78/mo before tax to get the same thing. That’s a lot of money that most people aren’t willing to pay – especially if, like me, you only watch a few hours of TV per week. No wonder people pirate it.
So think about that. I can pay $78 to Shaw, who then turns around and buys access to the channels, who sell access to advertisers to make money for production (or syndication rights). For that, I get hundreds of channels I’ll never watch, and years of content I have no interest in. Or, I can pay $20 (or even $30!) to subscribe to an entire season of Heroes, or any other show (adjust pricing accordingly for different types of shows).
It’s a no-brainer.
So please, accept the digital age. Accept that you can skip the middleman (or at least, a lot of the middle men). Accept that you can lower your overhead. Accept that impulse-buying is a good thing. Accept that having an entire season of Heroes paid off by the fifth episode is a good thing. Accept that you’ll be able to have TV series with long-running plots, because people will be able to easily start at the beginning, rather than wherever the networks happen to be airing them at. Accept that on-demand is better over the internet than through some broken cable box UI.
How do you stop piracy? You don’t. But if the iTunes Music Store can be more popular than free, I think you’ll find that giving people quality will encourage them to part with their hard-earned money.
Accept change, because the world is changing, with or without you. After all, I can already do everything I’ve talked about above, I’m just not paying you for the privilege.
Why I’m no longer following you
Feb 25th
First a note: this isn’t intended to any one person. Many, many people fall into this category for many reasons. I’m not going to single anyone out in particular.
I follow a lot of people. I’m not saying I’m following a lot of people. I follow a lot of people. How else are you going to know if they’re relevant to your interests? Interesting people follow me, and I follow back, or vice-versa. That’s how Twitter works after all, and I’m not some high-falutin’ Twitter royal who never has to follow back to be noticed and get involved with people on Twitter.
Twitter client requirements
Feb 12th
I want a good Twitter client. Here are the features I would like it to have. App names in parentheses are examples of how I want the feature to work, where necessary. More >